NATO Summit: What Media Narrative in Wartime?

This June 28, 29 and 30 will be the 32nd summit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, better known as NATO. A meeting that remains exceptional because these summits, rather than being scheduled at regular intervals as for other international organizations, are often held at key moments in the evolution of the Alliance. For this reason, the RTBF, like a large number of media, will cover the event.

Especially since this summit is only the second to be held in the particular context of the war in Ukraine. This will take up most of the discussions there because, as you no doubt know, NATO, although not officially a party to the conflict, strongly supports the armed forces of kyiv and unreservedly condemns the Russian intervention. Let us add that Belgium is a member of the organization and as such covering this summit is, in part, commenting on the actions of our own leaders (Prime Minister Alexander De Croo will obviously be present).

This is what, for many of you, raises many questions: is it possible for journalists from a NATO member country to report objectively on the actions of the Alliance? And by extension, the situation in Ukraine? Are we biased in our coverage of the conflict? Would it be different if our country were not part of NATO? As always, we will try to answer this tricky question honestly and openly.

►►► This article is not an info article like the others: all about the Inside approach of the editorial staff here.

As long as the war in Ukraine lasts, it might not be uninteresting to address the issue of information in wartime“, Leo suggests to us by email.”Belgium, as a member of NATO, is ‘mobilizedeven if it is not a formally military mobilization. […] If a journalist wanted to defend Putin’s point of view against NATO, would he be free to do so?“, he wonders. More bitter, Danielle also challenged us: “And if for once you tell us the truth about the war in Ukraine without automatically taking the side of Zelensky and that of the Americans and NATO ?”.”Stop advocating war even if it is our governors who want it. You have a duty to inform us fairly, without bias“, she finishes.

Small precision: we are not going to do here the detailed examination of the coverage of the conflict in Ukraine by the Info team of the RTBF. This work has also been partly done by “Inside” in the first weeks of the conflict. In reality, we wondered in 2018 about the complexity of informing about Russia. Here, on the occasion of the NATO Summit in Madrid and following your numerous questions, we wanted this time to focus on the possible influence that NATO could have on the work of journalists in general. Here are some elements of analysis.

We would love to thank the writer of this post for this amazing content

NATO Summit: What Media Narrative in Wartime?

Take a look at our social media profiles and other pages related to them